| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Jane Committee Member and Mod


Joined: 15 Feb 2006 Posts: 2819
Location: Southport
|
|
| Back to top |
|
SeaCopRimmer

Joined: 15 Feb 2006 Posts: 1014
Location: The land of the Shrimp and Vikings
|
|
| Back to top |
|
sheilarmarland

Joined: 04 Nov 2008 Posts: 25
Location: Bolton Lancashire
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Germaine

Joined: 28 Jun 2006 Posts: 719
Location: Fleetwood
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Bez Committee Member and Mod


Joined: 16 Feb 2006 Posts: 711
Location: Churchtown
|
|
| Back to top |
|
BrianG

Joined: 18 Feb 2006 Posts: 428
Location: Cambridge UK
|
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 10:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Just going back to the marriage in 1840 this is probably the GRO index, but how confuse Samuel with Sampson? Not an obvious transcription error to make; although I think it must be ok as the only (3) Sampson Jacksons in 1841 are in Staffs.
Marriages Jun 1840 (>99%)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GEORGSON Mary Wigan 21 454
JACKSON Sampson Wigan 21 454
MOSS Thomas Wigan 21 454
RIMMER Alice Wigan 21 454
RYDER John Wigan 21 454
TOPPING Mary Wigan 21 454
Brian
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Jane Committee Member and Mod


Joined: 15 Feb 2006 Posts: 2819
Location: Southport
|
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 10:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
That isn't what is on the actual GRO page for Jackson June quarter 1840
It does say SAMUEL JACKSON - Wigan - 21 454
So you are using the FreeBMD index? These are transcribed (and as far as I know double checked) so it is easy to make a typing error.
_________________ Mad on Genealogy or just plain mad? :)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
BrianG

Joined: 18 Feb 2006 Posts: 428
Location: Cambridge UK
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Jane Committee Member and Mod


Joined: 15 Feb 2006 Posts: 2819
Location: Southport
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Germaine

Joined: 28 Jun 2006 Posts: 719
Location: Fleetwood
|
|
| Back to top |
|
BrianG

Joined: 18 Feb 2006 Posts: 428
Location: Cambridge UK
|
|
| Back to top |
|
BrianG

Joined: 18 Feb 2006 Posts: 428
Location: Cambridge UK
|
Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 6:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Update on the Samuel Jackson - Alice Rimmer marriage
I mentioned the "Park" discrepancy to Joyce O. She has now had a look at the All Saints Wigan registers. The marriage details are as follows:
| Quote: | Date: 30th June 1840
Married after Banns
Samuel Jackson, 24, Bachelor, Weaver, Millgate, John Jackson, Weaver
Alice Rimmer, 24, Spinster, , Millgate, Robert Rimmer, Seaman
both signed
Witnesses were William Caunce & Lydia Caunce |
So that confirms the marriage. Alice "bigged up" her father from fisherman to seaman
Had a quick look for a marriage of a William Caunce to a Lydia. There's only one but it is 1842 Manchester, so 2 years later. The
wife is a Lydia Rimmer. It looks like this should be Alice's sister, as both age and birthplace tie in on the 1851 census. Also on that census are a Robert Rimmer (14) and Mary Rimmer (11) listed as "brother" and "sister" respectively. Mary is the wrong age, she should be 16, but Robert is spot on. Why would she sign as "Caunce" when they were not yet married? Ah just realised Lydia's dress might have been on the tight side for her sister's wedding; daughter Emily was born later in 1840
B
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Germaine

Joined: 28 Jun 2006 Posts: 719
Location: Fleetwood
|
|
| Back to top |
|
BrianG

Joined: 18 Feb 2006 Posts: 428
Location: Cambridge UK
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Yvonne

Joined: 14 Mar 2006 Posts: 363
Location: Southport
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|