| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Germaine

Joined: 28 Jun 2006 Posts: 173 Location: Fleetwood
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Bez Committee Member and Mod


Joined: 16 Feb 2006 Posts: 543 Location: Churchtown
|
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 2:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Hi Germaine, it's a lease for 3 lives, very common type of document. Dated 1802 it should be quite easy to read but probably isn't because you haven't done many and your eyes aren't used to it or the language employed (such as "appurtenances"). I suppose it's too big to scan or scale down to A4 on a photocopier? I could almost write it out but there are a couple of bits I can't fill in from your transcription and spelling varied depending on who wrote it. However, it's a very straightforward document, but by the 19th century they got to be so long-winded with all of that legal jargon.
_________________ Middle-aged and seeking the middle-ages!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Germaine

Joined: 28 Jun 2006 Posts: 173 Location: Fleetwood
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Bez Committee Member and Mod


Joined: 16 Feb 2006 Posts: 543 Location: Churchtown
|
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 2:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
I did have a look at the Apportionment Book for the tithe map (1839) and there was a James Meadows leased 5 plots in Mill Lane, Churchtown, but I wasn't sure which James this might be as 2 of the grandsons named on the lease had the same name. Also the landowner was Sir Henry Bold Hoghton but the owner of the Scarisbrick property was Thomas Eccleston, Esquire.
But yes, this was Churchtown Mill; the property described on the lease was in Scarisbrick - so you need an early map of Scarisbrick to look for the Mill Hey- the name of the field where it was situated.
_________________ Middle-aged and seeking the middle-ages!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Germaine

Joined: 28 Jun 2006 Posts: 173 Location: Fleetwood
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Jane Committee Member and Mod


Joined: 15 Feb 2006 Posts: 1947 Location: Southport
|
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 10:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thomas Eccleston - he owned Scarisbrick hall. he had changed his surname from Scarisbrick when he married into the Eccleston family - more to do with getting his hands on their land and money.
Charles changed it back to Scarisbrick when he inherited the hall after his Thomas's death.
_________________ Mad on Genealogy or just plain mad? :)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Germaine

Joined: 28 Jun 2006 Posts: 173 Location: Fleetwood
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Germaine

Joined: 28 Jun 2006 Posts: 173 Location: Fleetwood
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Bez Committee Member and Mod


Joined: 16 Feb 2006 Posts: 543 Location: Churchtown
|
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 1:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
I would have thought that Downholland was a bit too far away - in any case the lease would have said Downholland. I would have thought that Scarisbrick Hall would have had its own mill anyway and the lease did mention a common boundary with Thomas Eccleston's land. (His paddock to be exact). It also gives you the plot number (141) on the plan of the survey of Scarisbrick - this would be a survey commissioned by the landowner so it might be an idea to ask at the LRO. It says it consists of ¼ of an acre, but it doesn't mention a mill, only that James is of North Meols and is a miller, and that the field was called Mill Hey. You really need to look at the survey to see if there is a mill marked on it for that plot.
Leases for 3 lives ran until all 3 people named on them were dead, unless the landowner agreed to add a life when someone died (for a further fee, of course).
_________________ Middle-aged and seeking the middle-ages!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Germaine

Joined: 28 Jun 2006 Posts: 173 Location: Fleetwood
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Bez Committee Member and Mod


Joined: 16 Feb 2006 Posts: 543 Location: Churchtown
|
Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 2:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| For the mill - sounds likely if you've found it on a map. The house might have been a "two bay" house rather than having 2 bay windows - not a very big house at all. A five bay house would be rather large.
_________________ Middle-aged and seeking the middle-ages!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Germaine

Joined: 28 Jun 2006 Posts: 173 Location: Fleetwood
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Bez Committee Member and Mod


Joined: 16 Feb 2006 Posts: 543 Location: Churchtown
|
Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 3:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The bays were the bits between the upright posts forming the house. Probably easier to draw than describe.
_________________ Middle-aged and seeking the middle-ages!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Germaine

Joined: 28 Jun 2006 Posts: 173 Location: Fleetwood
|
Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 10:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ah i know what bays are now I was watching Grundy's Northern Pride and he explained.
Germaine
x
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Bez Committee Member and Mod


Joined: 16 Feb 2006 Posts: 543 Location: Churchtown
|
Posted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 1:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I must have missed that bit then.
_________________ Middle-aged and seeking the middle-ages!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|